tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14557405.post1419244036224728120..comments2023-12-21T19:01:06.831-06:00Comments on American Liberty: Secondhand Smoke: the “no threshold” ScareEdmund Contoskihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03785679880793143900noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14557405.post-89860279954644417582008-03-01T04:05:00.000-06:002008-03-01T04:05:00.000-06:00Thank you sooo much for this article, and for comb...Thank you sooo much for this article, and for combating the anti-smokers' studies with your<BR/>studies about second hand smoke. I wish they could stop the<BR/>smoking-phobia and descrimination against smokers. Facts are essencial so I hope that new researchers show another side of the coin. Opposites exist and they<BR/>deserve to be respected equally.<BR/>coin. Opposites exist and they deserve Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14557405.post-53028907087480792622008-02-08T06:16:00.000-06:002008-02-08T06:16:00.000-06:00VERY excellent article! I've made the "safe-leve...VERY excellent article! I've made the "safe-level threshold" argument several times myself in various forms, usually comparing ETS to sunlight and alcohol fumes (See:<BR/><BR/>http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/330/7495/812 )<BR/><BR/>but I don't think I've ever done it quite as clearly as you have.<BR/><BR/>Best of luck in your efforts!<BR/><BR/><BR/>Michael J. McFadden<BR/>Author of "DissectingMichael J. McFaddenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12181949578184965482noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14557405.post-91184576313901352752008-01-24T15:57:00.000-06:002008-01-24T15:57:00.000-06:00Thank you for using studies and not just opinions ...Thank you for using studies and not just opinions on your subjects. Your blog has been a eye opening experience for me keep up the good work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com