His Majesty Obama has been expanding
presidential powers since he became president. In bailing out
General Motors, he overturned a century of legal precedents in
bankruptcy proceedings, swept away the legal rights of GM stock
holders and distributed GM stock to the labor union.
He has also made extensive use of
executive orders to achieve his will without involving Congress, thus
bypassing the legislative function. Here is a list of
executive orders signed by U.S. presidents since World War II.
Harry Truman 5
Dwight Eisenhower 2
John F. Kennedy 5
Lyndon Johnson 4
Richard Nixon 1
Gerald Ford 3
Jimmy Carter 3
Ronald Reagan 5
George H.W. Bush 3
Bill Clinton 17
George W. Bush 77
Barrack Obama 146, as of December
12, 2012. Note, too, that most of the other totals are for
presidents who served 8 years.
(Source: Wikipedia, based on
“Administration of [president's name] Executive Orders Disposition
Tables” from the National Archives as published in the Federal
Register.)
The recent school shooting massacre has
again raised the issue of gun rights for the American people. The
president has made it clear that if Congress doesn't act on this
issue to his satisfaction, he will take action on it without
Congress. That probably means another executive order. It remains
to be seen how this would fit with the Supreme Court's decision that
citizens have a right to bear arms.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner has
suggested that Congress should avoid controversy over raising the
national debt limit by granting the president the authority to raise
it without limit whenever he wants and without future approval of
Congress. That would be a power characteristic of absolute monarchs.
Senate majority leader Harry Reid,
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and former president Bill Clinton are
urging Obama to evade the debt issue with Congress by unilaterally
raising the debt limit, presumably by an executive order. They argue
he should claim the authority via a controversial interpretation of
the Fourteenth Amendment. So the meaning of the Constitution would
be altered according to the wishes of the ruler rather than meaning
what it was intended to mean. That's another characteristic of an
absolute ruler, to employ a whimsical interpretation to unilaterally
alter the founding document of a government to serve his own
purposes.
It seems Obama's goal of “fundamentally
transforming” America is one of obliterating the concept of power
sharing among three equal branches of government and moving toward
the concentration of power in a single individual. Like a monarch.
If the legislators don't do what he wants, he will do it without
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment